Fire protection in a data center has four jobs, in this order: detect a fire while it is still smoke, confirm it before acting, put it out without destroying the equipment it protects, and get people out. Lithium-ion batteries add a fifth: keep flammable vent gas below the level at which it can explode. Every number on this page links to its source: a row of the site’s fire datasets [S1]–[S3], the fire engine [S4], a named standard, or an incident dossier.

1. What burns in a data center, and where

Almost every data-center fire starts in electrical equipment. What differs between zones is the fuel next to it and what the fire costs. In the eight fires in section 7, six started in UPS, battery or power rooms, one in a rack, and one in a power compartment; in most of them the outage came from cutting the power to fight the fire, not from the flames.

Ignition sources by zone
ZoneWhat ignitesFuel nearbyUsual protectionFires in section 7
IT white spaceServer or PSU fault, PDU, overheated connectionCable insulation, plastics in serversAspirating detection; clean agent or pre-action sprinklers (NFPA 75)Digital Realty LAX12, 2023
UPS and battery roomsUPS cabinet fault; lithium-ion thermal runaway; hydrogen from VRLA overcharge [S2]Electrolyte, vent gas, cell casingsGas detection and exhaust (NFPA 855); sprinklers or water mist; spacingOVHcloud 2021, SK C&C 2022, Digital Realty Singapore 2024, NIRS 2025, X Oregon 2025, STT Delhi 2026
Generator and fuelHot exhaust, fuel leak, starter faultDiesel in day tanks and pipeworkSprinklers; containment and leak detection; rated walls—
Cable trays and floor voidOverloaded or damaged cableCable sheaths running the length of the hallDetection in the void; sealed penetrations; NFPA 70 Art. 645 wiring [S3]—
Power plant (transformers, switchgear)Insulation failure, arcTransformer oil, switchgearCompartmentation; sprinklers or deluge; fire-rated separationNorthC Almere 2026

Fires in energised equipment are electrical fires (NFPA Class C) until the power is off; after that they burn as ordinary combustibles (Class A). Clean-agent design concentrations are quoted for Class A [S1].

2. Detection

The goal of detection is to find smoke early enough that staff can act before any automatic release. Three detector types do this job; release logic then decides when one alarm becomes a discharge.

2.1 Aspirating smoke detection (ASD, often called VESDA)

A fan draws air through a pipe network with sampling holes over the racks, in the return-air path and in the floor and ceiling voids. A central laser chamber measures the smoke in that air. EN 54-20 rates aspirating detectors in three sensitivity classes: Class A (very high sensitivity, for very early warning), Class B (enhanced) and Class C (normal). The site’s fire engine uses a pre-alarm sensitivity of 0.005 % obscuration per metre [S4]; the design band in the commissioning checklist is 0.005–0.05 %/m [S5].

Aspirating detector alarm levels, lowest first (VESDA names; other makers use similar levels)
LevelWhat it meansTypical action
AlertSmoke above the room’s normal backgroundOperator investigates the zone
ActionSmoke risingStaff go to the zone; prepare to isolate the source
Fire 1Fire conditionBuilding fire alarm; counts as one zone for cross-zoning
Fire 2Higher fire conditionSecond input to release logic where the design uses it

The thresholds are set per site from the measured background, not from a fixed number. High airflow in a data hall dilutes smoke, which is why air sampling is preferred over ceiling detectors alone.

2.2 Spot detectors

Point-type smoke detectors on the ceiling and in voids. NFPA 72 sets a nominal spacing of 9.1 m (30 ft), about 84 m² per detector [S3] [S4], and requires the spacing to be reduced where air changes are high, which is normal in a data hall. Each level that contains combustibles (room, floor void, ceiling void) is counted separately. Example: a 600 m² hall needs at least 600 / 84 = 7.1, so 8 detectors per level before the airflow reduction (derived).

2.3 Cross-zoned release

A gas release is expensive and, for some agents, unsafe for people still in the room, so one detector is never allowed to release it. Cross-zoned detection requires two independent detectors or zones to alarm before the panel starts the release sequence [S5]. The sequence then sounds a pre-discharge alarm, stops the air handlers, closes the dampers, and runs a time delay (typically 30 s [S5]) so occupants can leave. An abort switch holds the delay while it is pressed. A manual release station at the exit releases the agent directly, and an abort switch does not cancel a manual release.

From first smoke to agent releaseTwo detection zones feed the fire alarm panel; release needs both, then a pre-discharge delay that an abort switch can hold.Aspirating detectorzone 1 · pipe networkSpot smoke detectorzone 2 · 84 m² eachFire alarm panel1 zone: alarm onlyPre-discharge alarmHVAC off · dampers shutAbort switchholds the delayTYP. 30 STime delayoccupants leaveManual releasestation at the exitRelease solenoidopens cylinders≤ 10 S · HOLD ≥ 10 MINAgent discharge2 ZONESHOLDDIRECTLEGENDDecision logicHuman action From first smoke to agent releaseTwo detection zones feed the fire alarm panel; release needs both, then a pre-discharge delay that an abort switch can hold.Aspirating detectorzone 1 · pipe networkSpot smoke detectorzone 2 · 84 m² eachFire alarm panel1 zone: alarm onlyPre-discharge alarmHVAC off · dampers shutAbort switchholds the delayTYP. 30 STime delayoccupants leaveManual releasestation at the exitRelease solenoidopens cylinders≤ 10 S · HOLD ≥ 10 MINAgent discharge2 ZONESHOLDDIRECTLEGENDDecision logicHuman action
From first smoke to agent release. One zone in alarm only alarms; two independent zones start the pre-discharge sequence, which shuts the air handlers and dampers and runs a time delay (typ. 30 s [S5]) that the abort switch can hold. Halocarbon discharge completes in 10 s or less and the room must hold the concentration for at least 10 min [S1][S4].

2.4 Lithium-ion off-gas detection

A lithium-ion cell heading into thermal runaway vents hydrogen, carbon monoxide and electrolyte vapour before it burns [S2]. Smoke detectors see this late. NFPA 855 requires gas detection that alarms at 25 % of the lower flammable limit (LFL) and starts exhaust [S3]. The LFL of hydrogen is 4.0 % by volume and of carbon monoxide 12.5 %; the mixed vent gas is about 6 % [S2]. So the alarm point is 1.0 % hydrogen (10,000 ppm), or about 1.5 % of mixed vent gas (derived). Off-gassing is covered in detail in section 4.

3. Suppression

Two families protect IT rooms: gaseous agents, which fill the room and leave no residue, and water systems, which cool and are the building-level backstop. Many sites use both: a clean agent for the room and pre-action sprinklers because the building code or insurer requires sprinklers.

3.1 Clean agents (NFPA 2001, ISO 14520)

Halocarbon agents (Novec 1230, FM-200) absorb heat and interrupt the flame chemistry; inert gases (IG-541, IG-55) lower the oxygen level. The rules that matter:

  • Design concentration: the agent percentage by volume the system must reach. It sits above the minimum extinguishing concentration by a safety factor [S1].
  • NOAEL and LOAEL: the highest concentration with no observed adverse effect, and the lowest with one. In a normally occupied room the design concentration must be at or below the NOAEL [S1] [S5].
  • Discharge time: 10 s or less for halocarbons, 60 s for the inert gases in the table [S1].
  • Hold time: the concentration must be retained for at least 10 min [S3] [S4].
  • Room integrity: the hold time depends on how tight the room is. A door-fan test (NFPA 2001 Annex C) measures the leakage area and predicts the hold time; the room is sealed and re-tested until it passes [S5].

Agent mass for halocarbons, from NFPA 2001 [S3]:

W = (V / s) · C / (100 − C)      s = k1 + k2 · T

W  agent mass, kg          V  protected volume, m³
C  design concentration, % T  minimum room temperature, °C
s  specific vapour volume, m³/kg   (k1, k2 per agent, table below)

Worked example, a 500 m³ room at 20 °C (derived from [S1]):

  • Novec 1230 at 4.7 %: s = 0.0664 + 0.0002741 × 20 = 0.07188 m³/kg; W = (500 / 0.07188) × 4.7 / 95.3 = 343 kg.
  • FM-200 at 7.0 %: s = 0.1269 + 0.0005132 × 20 = 0.13716 m³/kg; W = (500 / 0.13716) × 7.0 / 93.0 = 274 kg.

Inert gases are sized by volume: X = ln(100 / (100 − C)) m³ of agent per m³ of room [S4]. IG-541 at 37.5 % needs ln(1.6) = 0.47 m³/m³, or 235 m³ for the same room, before the temperature correction (derived). The oxygen left in the room is about 20.9 × (1 − C/100): 13.1 % at 37.5 % IG-541 and 12.5 % at 40 % IG-55 (derived). The fire calculator runs these equations, the cylinder count and the NOAEL check.

Clean-agent properties, one row per row of data/fire/clean-agent-properties.csv [S1]. Design % is for Class A fires; GWP over 100 years.
Agent (chemical)TypeDesign %Min. ext. %NOAEL %LOAEL %k1k2Discharge, sGWPLife, yrSource
Novec 1230 (FK-5-1-12)halocarbon4.73.510.010.00.06640.00027411010.014NFPA 2001 + 3M
FM-200 (HFC-227ea)halocarbon7.05.89.010.50.12690.0005132103,22036NFPA 2001 + IPCC
IG-541 (Inergen: 52 % N₂, 40 % Ar, 8 % CO₂)inert37.534.24352——6000NFPA 2001
IG-55 (Argonite: 50 % N₂, 50 % Ar)inert40354352——6000NFPA 2001
CO₂ (high-pressure carbon dioxide)inert34—————601—NFPA 12; lethal, not for occupied rooms

Reading the table: FM-200’s design concentration (7.0 %) is close to its NOAEL (9.0 %); Novec 1230 has more margin (4.7 % against 10.0 %). FM-200 has a GWP of 3,220 and is being phased down under HFC rules; Novec 1230 has a GWP of 1 [S1]. The comparison is worked through on FM-200 vs Novec 1230. Two further points: a halocarbon discharge first drops and then raises the room pressure, and an inert-gas discharge raises it strongly, so NFPA 2001 requires the enclosure pressure to be checked and most inert systems need a pressure relief vent.

Clean-agent room: volume, discharge, holdCylinders discharge through nozzles into the sealed room; agent leaks out through penetrations; a door-fan test measures the leakage and predicts the hold time.PROTECTED VOLUME VW = (V/S)·C/(100−C)Agent cylindersmass per NFPA 2001≤ 10 S HALOCARBONDischarge nozzles≤ 60 s inert gasAgent–air mixturedesign C ≤ NOAELHVAC dampersclosed on releasePressure relief ventlimits room pressureLeak pathscables · doors · voidsNFPA 2001 ANNEX CDoor-fan testmeasures leakage area≥ 10 MINPredicted hold timepass or seal and re-testSEALEDAGENT DRAINS OUTMEASURESPREDICTSLEGENDAgentTest, not in serviceAgent loss Clean-agent room: volume, discharge, holdCylinders discharge through nozzles into the sealed room; agent leaks out through penetrations; a door-fan test measures the leakage and predicts the hold time.PROTECTED VOLUME VW = (V/S)·C/(100−C)Agent cylindersmass per NFPA 2001≤ 10 S HALOCARBONDischarge nozzles≤ 60 s inert gasAgent–air mixturedesign C ≤ NOAELHVAC dampersclosed on releasePressure relief ventlimits room pressureLeak pathscables · doors · voidsNFPA 2001 ANNEX CDoor-fan testmeasures leakage area≥ 10 MINPredicted hold timepass or seal and re-testSEALEDAGENT DRAINS OUTMEASURESPREDICTSLEGENDAgentTest, not in serviceAgent loss
A clean-agent room is a sealed volume. The agent mass is sized to the whole protected volume, discharged in 10 s or less, and must stay at concentration for at least 10 min while it leaks out through penetrations [S1][S4]. The door-fan test measures that leakage and predicts the hold time before any agent is used (NFPA 2001 Annex C).

3.2 Water-based systems (NFPA 13, NFPA 750)

NFPA 75 permits sprinklers in IT rooms, and many building codes require them regardless of a gas system [S3]. The type of sprinkler system decides how likely an accidental discharge is.

Sprinkler and water-mist systems
SystemPipe when idleWater flows whenEffect of one false signalUse in a data center
Wet pipeFull of waterA sprinkler head opens from heatA damaged head floods at onceOffices, plant rooms
Pre-action, single interlockDry (supervisory air)Detection opens the valve, then a head opensDetection alone fills the pipe; no water out until a head opensIT rooms where allowed
Pre-action, double interlockDry (supervisory air)Detection AND a head opening (loss of air pressure), both requiredNeither signal alone admits water to the pipeUsual choice for IT rooms (NFPA 13) [S3]
Water mist (NFPA 750)Dry or wet, high pressureAs above, through fine nozzlesMuch less water than a sprinklerBattery rooms, generator rooms, some IT rooms

The trade-offs between wet and pre-action systems are set out on wet vs pre-action. Sprinklers respond to heat, so they act late; the Digital Realty LAX12 fire in 2023 was stopped by sprinklers, and the water damaged servers (dossier).

3.3 Emergency power off

NFPA 70 Article 645 covers IT rooms and the emergency power off (EPO): a guarded, two-stage station that de-energises the room so firefighters can work [S3]. The EPO sequence is tied to the suppression release and tested with it [S5]. Accidental EPO operation takes rooms down, which is why the guard and the second stage exist. In the X Oregon fire of 2025 the burning UPS cabinet was still energised and firefighters had to wait for it to be isolated (dossier).

4. Lithium-ion batteries

Lithium-ion UPS and battery backup units have replaced most lead-acid (VRLA) strings. They need a different plan because a cell in thermal runaway heats itself and spreads to the next cell, and no gaseous agent stops that reaction. In the SK C&C, Digital Realty Singapore and NIRS fires the batteries burned or re-ignited for hours while water cooled them (section 7). The order of protection is: monitor the cells, detect gas and ventilate, control an explosion, separate the units, and then suppress the surrounding fire.

Battery chemistry, one row per row of data/fire/li-ion-chemistry.csv [S2]
RowFull nameRunaway onset, °CEnergy density, Wh/kgOff-gas, L/WhRunaway heat factorOff-gas speciesUse in data centersSource, basis
NMCLithium nickel manganese cobalt1502204.02.5H₂, CO, CO₂, electrolyte vapour, hydrocarbonsYes (site model: UPS BBU 8 × 1,333 kWh)Nature Sci. Reports 2024 + UL 9540A; standard
LFPLithium iron phosphate166.81402.01.2H₂, CO, CO₂, electrolyte vapourYes (trend to safer chemistry)Nature Sci. Reports 2024 + UL 9540A; standard
LCOLithium cobalt oxide1501804.52.6H₂, CO, CO₂, O₂, electrolyte vapourRareLiterature; illustrative
VRLAValve-regulated lead-acid—4000H₂ when overcharged; no thermal runaway of the lithium kindLegacy UPSIEEE 1188; standard
offgas_LFLFlammability of the vent gas————LFL: H₂ 4.0 % vol; CO 12.5 %; vent-gas blend about 6 %—NFPA 855 / UL 9540A gas-detection basis; standard

How much gas: one 1,333 kWh NMC pack at 4.0 L/Wh can vent 1,333,000 × 4.0 = 5,332,000 L, or 5,332 m³ (derived from [S2]). At a 6 % LFL that is enough to make 5,332 / 0.06 = 88,900 m³ of flammable mixture. An LFP pack of the same size vents half as much (2,666 m³, 44,400 m³ of mixture). No battery room is that large, so the room volume does not dilute a full runaway; exhaust started at 25 % LFL, and the BMS stopping the event earlier, have to.

Li-ion off-gas against the LFLConcentration rises from cell venting to 25 % of the LFL, where gas detection starts exhaust, and to 100 % of the LFL, where a deflagration becomes possible.ONSET 150–167 °CCell overheatsNMC 150 · LFP 166.8 °CIEC 62619BMS alarmisolate the stringCell vents gasH₂ · CO · CO₂ · vapour1.0 % H₂ BY VOLUME25 % of LFLNFPA 855Gas alarm + exhaustH₂ / CO sensors trip4.0 % H₂ BY VOLUME100 % of LFLNFPA 68 / 69Explosion controlvent or preventRunaway spreadscell to cellWater coolinggas agent cannot stop itTRIPEXHAUST FAILSLEGENDRising gas concentrationAction Li-ion off-gas against the LFLConcentration rises from cell venting to 25 % of the LFL, where gas detection starts exhaust, and to 100 % of the LFL, where a deflagration becomes possible.ONSET 150–167 °CCell overheatsNMC 150 · LFP 166.8 °CIEC 62619BMS alarmisolate the stringCell vents gasH₂ · CO · CO₂ · vapour1.0 % H₂ BY VOLUME25 % of LFLNFPA 855Gas alarm + exhaustH₂ / CO sensors trip4.0 % H₂ BY VOLUME100 % of LFLNFPA 68 / 69Explosion controlvent or preventRunaway spreadscell to cellWater coolinggas agent cannot stop itTRIPLEGENDRising gas concentrationAction
Lithium-ion off-gas against the lower flammable limit (LFL). Detection and exhaust must act at 25 % of the LFL, which for hydrogen is 1.0 % by volume [S2][S3]. One 1,333 kWh NMC pack can vent 5,332 m³ of gas, enough to bring 88,900 m³ of mixture to the LFL (derived from [S2]): no battery room is that large, so ventilation, not volume, keeps it safe.
Protection layers for a lithium-ion battery room, in the order they act
LayerWhat it doesStandard
1. Cell monitoringThe battery management system (BMS) watches cell voltage and temperature and disconnects a string on an anomaly, before ventingIEC 62619; UL 9540 [S3]
2. Gas detection and exhaustH₂/CO sensors alarm at 25 % LFL and start mechanical exhaustNFPA 855 [S3]
3. Explosion controlDeflagration vent panels or explosion prevention by ventilation, for when gas exceeds the LFLNFPA 855, which refers to NFPA 68 and NFPA 69
4. Spacing and separationUnit spacing and fire-rated walls set from UL 9540A propagation tests at cell, module and unit level, so one unit cannot ignite the nextNFPA 855; UL 9540A [S3]
5. SuppressionSprinklers or water mist cool the units and stop the surrounding fire; a clean agent can put out flames but not the runawayNFPA 13; NFPA 750; NFPA 2001
6. SitingBattery rooms not above or beside IT halls, so firefighting water cannot reach the serversLesson from Digital Realty Singapore 2024 (dossier)

The fire calculator computes the off-gas volume and runaway energy for a given pack, and the fire checklist lists the battery-room requirements item by item.

5. Standards and the number each one fixes

Twelve documents set the numbers on this page. The AHJ (the authority having jurisdiction: fire service or building authority) and the insurer decide which edition applies to a site.

Standards register, one row per row of data/fire/standards-references.csv [S3]
StandardWhat it governsNumber or rule it fixesEdition
NFPA 2001Clean-agent extinguishing systemsW = (V/s)·C/(100−C); halocarbon discharge ≤ 10 s; hold ≥ 10 min2022
NFPA 72Fire alarm and signalling (detection)Spot smoke detector spacing about 9.1 m (about 84 m²); aspirating very-early warning2022
NFPA 75Fire protection of IT equipmentRoom fire rating; suppression; pre-action sprinklers permitted2024
NFPA 76Fire protection of telecom facilitiesDetection and suppression for telecom spaces2024
NFPA 13Sprinkler installationWet vs pre-action; double interlock for data centers2025
NFPA 855Stationary energy storageLi-ion siting and spacing; gas detection at 25 % LFL; explosion control2023
NFPA 70 (NEC)Electrical installations, EPOArt. 645 IT rooms; guarded two-stage EPO2023
UL 9540Energy storage system safetyProduct safety certification of the ESScurrent
UL 9540AThermal-runaway fire propagation testOff-gas and propagation test at cell, module and unit level2024
IEC 62619Safety of industrial lithium cells and batteriesThermal-runaway and safety requirements2022
FM Global DS 5-32Data-center loss preventionThe insurer’s data-center fire-protection data sheetcurrent
ISO 14520Gaseous extinguishing systemsThe international counterpart of NFPA 2001current

Also cited on this page: EN 54-20 (aspirating detector classes), NFPA 12 (CO₂ systems), NFPA 25 (inspection of water systems), NFPA 750 (water mist), NFPA 68 and 69 (explosion venting and prevention). The NFPA fire and risk lab works through NFPA 75 and 76 room by room.

6. Inspection, testing and commissioning

A fire system that is not tested drifts: detectors clog, cylinders lose pressure, and new cable penetrations open the room. The table lists the minimum intervals from the standards and the shorter intervals the site checklist adds.

Inspection and test intervals
TaskIntervalBasis
Visual check: cylinder pressure, fire panel status, gas-detection statusDailySite practice [S5]
Aspirating detector airflow and filter checkWeeklySite practice [S5]
Fire panel function test; abort and manual-release station testMonthlySite practice, NFPA 72 [S5]
Detector sensitivity check; H₂/CO sensor calibrationQuarterlySite practice, NFPA 72 / 2001 [S5]
Agent quantity and container pressureAt least every 6 monthsNFPA 2001, ch. 7
Clean-agent system inspected and tested; cylinder weight and pressureAnnuallyNFPA 2001, ch. 7 [S5]
Enclosure inspected for new penetrations; door-fan re-testAnnually, and after any change to the roomNFPA 2001, ch. 7 [S5]
Detectors and manual stations functional testAnnuallyNFPA 72, ch. 14
Smoke detector sensitivity testWithin 1 year of installation, then every 2 yearsNFPA 72, ch. 14
Sprinklers inspected from the floorAnnuallyNFPA 25, ch. 5
Pre-action valve trip testAnnually; full-flow trip every 3 yearsNFPA 25, ch. 13
Main drain testAnnuallyNFPA 25, ch. 13
Integrated systems test: detection, alarm, HVAC, EPO, release, BMS togetherAnnually and at commissioningSite practice [S5]

Commissioning gates before the system is accepted [S5]:

  1. Room integrity: door-fan test shows the concentration is held for at least 10 min; seal and re-test until it passes.
  2. Agent quantity: charged weight or pressure matches the design calculation; cylinder serials and fill weights recorded.
  3. Discharge (where required): full discharge in 10 s or less (halocarbon) or 60 s or less (inert), and the measured concentration reaches design.
  4. Cross-zoning: no single detector releases the agent; pre-discharge delay, abort and manual release all work.
  5. Interlocks: on a confirmed alarm the air handlers stop, dampers close and the EPO sequence runs.
  6. Li-ion gas detection: sensors calibrated; alarm at or below 25 % LFL starts the exhaust; the BMS shutdown sequence is confirmed.
  7. Integrated systems test: detection to alarm to HVAC to EPO to release to BMS, end to end.

The full item list, the symptom-cause-action table and a printable service record are on the fire checklist.

7. Fires in data centers, 2021–2026

Each row links to a dossier with the sequence of events, the sources and an FMEA. Common pattern: the burned area was small, and the outage came from the power cut needed to fight the fire, from water reaching IT equipment, or from batteries that kept re-igniting.

Eight data-center fires and what each one showed
DateSiteWhere it startedCause classWhat the record shows
2021-03-10OVHcloud SBG2, StrasbourgGround-floor energy roomsUPS and lead-acid battery faultRooms had detection but no automatic suppression; the UPS and its batteries were in separate rooms and the fault spanned both; wooden floors and single-skin cladding of the free-cooling design helped the fire spread.
2022-10-15SK C&C Pangyo, SeongnamUPS room, basement level 3Lithium-ion UPS batteryAbout 40 m² burned, but about 32,000 servers went dark because power had to be cut; gas suppression cannot stop a cell in runaway; Kakao had its core services at this one site.
2023-05-21Digital Realty LAX12, El SegundoA rack in colocation suite 4Cause undeterminedSprinklers stopped the spread and the water damaged many servers; power was cut to suites 3 and 4, so an unburned suite went dark too.
2024-09-10Digital Realty Loyang, SingaporeBattery rooms, third-floor mezzanineLithium-ion battery, electrical issueWater could cool the batteries but not stop propagation, so firefighting lasted days; water reached the server halls and forced the power shutdown that caused the outage.
2025-05-22X (Twitter), Digital Realty Hillsboro, OregonUPS power cabinet, second floorUPS cabinet faultAbout $250,000 of equipment damage caused a near-global platform outage; the cabinet was still energised, so firefighters could only contain the fire until it was isolated.
2025-09-26NIRS government data center, DaejeonFifth-floor UPS room, during battery relocationLithium-ion UPS batteryA battery switched off for the move ignited about 40 minutes later; 647 government systems went offline, 96 destroyed; initial knockdown took over 10 hours.
2026-05-07NorthC AlmereRear technical compartment with power equipmentNot disclosed (investigation open)Compartmentation kept the fire out of the data halls, but transformers and UPS shared the compartment, so the site lost all power and the power plant had to be rebuilt.
2026-06-05STT GDC Delhi (Google Cloud POP)Tenant’s third-floor battery room (third-party reporting)Lithium battery unitsA protective power shutdown isolated a Google network POP and degraded Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai; recovery took about three weeks, gated by safety clearance.

All incident dossiers are listed on the incident library.

8. Tools, data and terms

Fire-protection tools and datasets on this site
Page or fileWhat it does
Fire calculatorClean-agent mass (NFPA 2001), cylinder count, NOAEL check, GWP, detector count, Li-ion off-gas volume and runaway energy
Fire checklistDesign bands, battery-room requirements, commissioning procedure, test intervals, symptom-cause-action table, service record
Fire system P&IDInteractive schematic: detection layers, suppression zones, alarm and EPO integration
NFPA fire and risk labNFPA 75 and 76 requirements room by room, with a risk model
FM-200 vs Novec 1230The two halocarbon agents compared: concentration, safety margin, GWP, regulation
Wet vs pre-actionSprinkler system types compared for IT rooms
PFAS vapour release (article 26)Fluorinated fluids such as the Novec family in cooling systems, and what leaks from them
clean-agent-properties.csv, li-ion-chemistry.csv, standards-references.csvThe three datasets behind the tables on this page (README)

Glossary: cross-zoned detection · design concentration · NOAEL / LOAEL · room integrity · off-gassing · thermal runaway · NFPA 855 · UL 9540A · VESDA · pre-action · Inergen · EPO

Frequently asked questions

Which fire suppression system is used in a data center IT room?

Usually a clean agent (Novec 1230 or FM-200) or an inert gas (IG-541, IG-55) that fills the room in 10 s or less (60 s for inert gas) and holds for at least 10 minutes, plus pre-action double-interlock sprinklers where the building code or insurer requires sprinklers. NFPA 75 permits pre-action sprinklers in IT rooms; CO₂ is not used in occupied rooms because it is lethal at its design concentration.

How much clean agent does a room need?

NFPA 2001 gives W = (V/s) × C/(100 − C), with s = k1 + k2 × T. For a 500 m³ room at 20 °C this is 343 kg of Novec 1230 at 4.7 % or 274 kg of FM-200 at 7.0 %. The design concentration must stay at or below the agent NOAEL in an occupied room: 10.0 % for Novec 1230, 9.0 % for FM-200.

Can a clean agent put out a lithium-ion battery fire?

It can put out flames around the battery but it cannot stop a cell in thermal runaway, which makes its own heat and spreads cell to cell. Protection relies on cell monitoring by the BMS, H₂/CO gas detection that alarms at 25 % of the lower flammable limit and starts exhaust (NFPA 855), explosion control, spacing tested to UL 9540A, and water for cooling.

What is cross-zoned detection?

Two independent detectors or detection zones must both alarm before the fire panel starts a gas release. One zone alone raises an alarm only. After the second zone, the panel sounds a pre-discharge alarm, stops air handlers, closes dampers and runs a time delay, typically 30 s, which an abort switch can hold.

How often is a data center fire system inspected and tested?

Clean-agent quantity and pressure at least every 6 months and a full inspection and test annually (NFPA 2001); the room is checked annually for new penetrations and door-fan re-tested after changes; detectors are functionally tested annually and their sensitivity within a year of installation and then every 2 years (NFPA 72); pre-action valves are trip-tested annually with a full-flow trip every 3 years (NFPA 25).

Sources

  • [S1] Clean-agent properties dataset — data/fire/clean-agent-properties.csv, 5 rows, compiled from NFPA 2001 (2022) tables, the 3M Novec 1230 datasheet, IPCC and NFPA 12. Taken: design and extinguishing concentrations, NOAEL/LOAEL, k1/k2, discharge times, GWP.
  • [S2] Lithium-ion chemistry dataset — data/fire/li-ion-chemistry.csv, 5 rows, compiled from Nature Scientific Reports (2024), UL 9540A, IEEE 1188 and NFPA 855. Taken: runaway onset, off-gas volume and species, LFL values.
  • [S3] Standards register — data/fire/standards-references.csv, 12 rows with links to each publisher. Taken: the number or rule each standard fixes.
  • [S4] Fire calculation engine — js/fire-model.js and data/fire/README.md, validated by tools/test-fire-calc.mjs. Taken: discharge ≤ 10 s, hold ≥ 10 min, 84 m² per spot detector, ASD pre-alarm 0.005 %/m, inert-gas volume equation.
  • [S5] Fire design, commissioning and Li-ion checklist — fire-checklist.html, sections 02, 04 and 07. Taken: ASD band 0.005–0.05 %/m, cross-zoning, 30 s pre-discharge delay (typical), commissioning gates, site test intervals.
  • [S6] Standards cited by clause or chapter in the text: NFPA 2001 (2022) ch. 7 and Annex C; NFPA 72 (2022) ch. 14; NFPA 25 ch. 5 and 13; NFPA 13 (2025); NFPA 855 (2023); NFPA 750; NFPA 68; NFPA 69; NFPA 12; EN 54-20 (aspirating smoke detectors). Links to the publishers are in section 5.
  • [S7] Incident dossiers on this site, one per row of section 7, each with its own source list.