Fire protection in a data center has four jobs, in this order: detect a fire while it is still smoke, confirm it before acting, put it out without destroying the equipment it protects, and get people out. Lithium-ion batteries add a fifth: keep flammable vent gas below the level at which it can explode. Every number on this page links to its source: a row of the site’s fire datasets [S1]–[S3], the fire engine [S4], a named standard, or an incident dossier.
1. What burns in a data center, and where
Almost every data-center fire starts in electrical equipment. What differs between zones is the fuel next to it and what the fire costs. In the eight fires in section 7, six started in UPS, battery or power rooms, one in a rack, and one in a power compartment; in most of them the outage came from cutting the power to fight the fire, not from the flames.
| Zone | What ignites | Fuel nearby | Usual protection | Fires in section 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT white space | Server or PSU fault, PDU, overheated connection | Cable insulation, plastics in servers | Aspirating detection; clean agent or pre-action sprinklers (NFPA 75) | Digital Realty LAX12, 2023 |
| UPS and battery rooms | UPS cabinet fault; lithium-ion thermal runaway; hydrogen from VRLA overcharge [S2] | Electrolyte, vent gas, cell casings | Gas detection and exhaust (NFPA 855); sprinklers or water mist; spacing | OVHcloud 2021, SK C&C 2022, Digital Realty Singapore 2024, NIRS 2025, X Oregon 2025, STT Delhi 2026 |
| Generator and fuel | Hot exhaust, fuel leak, starter fault | Diesel in day tanks and pipework | Sprinklers; containment and leak detection; rated walls | — |
| Cable trays and floor void | Overloaded or damaged cable | Cable sheaths running the length of the hall | Detection in the void; sealed penetrations; NFPA 70 Art. 645 wiring [S3] | — |
| Power plant (transformers, switchgear) | Insulation failure, arc | Transformer oil, switchgear | Compartmentation; sprinklers or deluge; fire-rated separation | NorthC Almere 2026 |
Fires in energised equipment are electrical fires (NFPA Class C) until the power is off; after that they burn as ordinary combustibles (Class A). Clean-agent design concentrations are quoted for Class A [S1].
2. Detection
The goal of detection is to find smoke early enough that staff can act before any automatic release. Three detector types do this job; release logic then decides when one alarm becomes a discharge.
2.1 Aspirating smoke detection (ASD, often called VESDA)
A fan draws air through a pipe network with sampling holes over the racks, in the return-air path and in the floor and ceiling voids. A central laser chamber measures the smoke in that air. EN 54-20 rates aspirating detectors in three sensitivity classes: Class A (very high sensitivity, for very early warning), Class B (enhanced) and Class C (normal). The site’s fire engine uses a pre-alarm sensitivity of 0.005 % obscuration per metre [S4]; the design band in the commissioning checklist is 0.005–0.05 %/m [S5].
| Level | What it means | Typical action |
|---|---|---|
| Alert | Smoke above the room’s normal background | Operator investigates the zone |
| Action | Smoke rising | Staff go to the zone; prepare to isolate the source |
| Fire 1 | Fire condition | Building fire alarm; counts as one zone for cross-zoning |
| Fire 2 | Higher fire condition | Second input to release logic where the design uses it |
The thresholds are set per site from the measured background, not from a fixed number. High airflow in a data hall dilutes smoke, which is why air sampling is preferred over ceiling detectors alone.
2.2 Spot detectors
Point-type smoke detectors on the ceiling and in voids. NFPA 72 sets a nominal spacing of 9.1 m (30 ft), about 84 m² per detector [S3] [S4], and requires the spacing to be reduced where air changes are high, which is normal in a data hall. Each level that contains combustibles (room, floor void, ceiling void) is counted separately. Example: a 600 m² hall needs at least 600 / 84 = 7.1, so 8 detectors per level before the airflow reduction (derived).
2.3 Cross-zoned release
A gas release is expensive and, for some agents, unsafe for people still in the room, so one detector is never allowed to release it. Cross-zoned detection requires two independent detectors or zones to alarm before the panel starts the release sequence [S5]. The sequence then sounds a pre-discharge alarm, stops the air handlers, closes the dampers, and runs a time delay (typically 30 s [S5]) so occupants can leave. An abort switch holds the delay while it is pressed. A manual release station at the exit releases the agent directly, and an abort switch does not cancel a manual release.
2.4 Lithium-ion off-gas detection
A lithium-ion cell heading into thermal runaway vents hydrogen, carbon monoxide and electrolyte vapour before it burns [S2]. Smoke detectors see this late. NFPA 855 requires gas detection that alarms at 25 % of the lower flammable limit (LFL) and starts exhaust [S3]. The LFL of hydrogen is 4.0 % by volume and of carbon monoxide 12.5 %; the mixed vent gas is about 6 % [S2]. So the alarm point is 1.0 % hydrogen (10,000 ppm), or about 1.5 % of mixed vent gas (derived). Off-gassing is covered in detail in section 4.
3. Suppression
Two families protect IT rooms: gaseous agents, which fill the room and leave no residue, and water systems, which cool and are the building-level backstop. Many sites use both: a clean agent for the room and pre-action sprinklers because the building code or insurer requires sprinklers.
3.1 Clean agents (NFPA 2001, ISO 14520)
Halocarbon agents (Novec 1230, FM-200) absorb heat and interrupt the flame chemistry; inert gases (IG-541, IG-55) lower the oxygen level. The rules that matter:
- Design concentration: the agent percentage by volume the system must reach. It sits above the minimum extinguishing concentration by a safety factor [S1].
- NOAEL and LOAEL: the highest concentration with no observed adverse effect, and the lowest with one. In a normally occupied room the design concentration must be at or below the NOAEL [S1] [S5].
- Discharge time: 10 s or less for halocarbons, 60 s for the inert gases in the table [S1].
- Hold time: the concentration must be retained for at least 10 min [S3] [S4].
- Room integrity: the hold time depends on how tight the room is. A door-fan test (NFPA 2001 Annex C) measures the leakage area and predicts the hold time; the room is sealed and re-tested until it passes [S5].
Agent mass for halocarbons, from NFPA 2001 [S3]:
W = (V / s) · C / (100 − C) s = k1 + k2 · T W agent mass, kg V protected volume, m³ C design concentration, % T minimum room temperature, °C s specific vapour volume, m³/kg (k1, k2 per agent, table below)
Worked example, a 500 m³ room at 20 °C (derived from [S1]):
- Novec 1230 at 4.7 %: s = 0.0664 + 0.0002741 × 20 = 0.07188 m³/kg; W = (500 / 0.07188) × 4.7 / 95.3 = 343 kg.
- FM-200 at 7.0 %: s = 0.1269 + 0.0005132 × 20 = 0.13716 m³/kg; W = (500 / 0.13716) × 7.0 / 93.0 = 274 kg.
Inert gases are sized by volume: X = ln(100 / (100 − C)) m³ of agent per m³ of room [S4]. IG-541 at 37.5 % needs ln(1.6) = 0.47 m³/m³, or 235 m³ for the same room, before the temperature correction (derived). The oxygen left in the room is about 20.9 × (1 − C/100): 13.1 % at 37.5 % IG-541 and 12.5 % at 40 % IG-55 (derived). The fire calculator runs these equations, the cylinder count and the NOAEL check.
| Agent (chemical) | Type | Design % | Min. ext. % | NOAEL % | LOAEL % | k1 | k2 | Discharge, s | GWP | Life, yr | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novec 1230 (FK-5-1-12) | halocarbon | 4.7 | 3.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 0.0664 | 0.0002741 | 10 | 1 | 0.014 | NFPA 2001 + 3M |
| FM-200 (HFC-227ea) | halocarbon | 7.0 | 5.8 | 9.0 | 10.5 | 0.1269 | 0.0005132 | 10 | 3,220 | 36 | NFPA 2001 + IPCC |
| IG-541 (Inergen: 52 % N₂, 40 % Ar, 8 % CO₂) | inert | 37.5 | 34.2 | 43 | 52 | — | — | 60 | 0 | 0 | NFPA 2001 |
| IG-55 (Argonite: 50 % N₂, 50 % Ar) | inert | 40 | 35 | 43 | 52 | — | — | 60 | 0 | 0 | NFPA 2001 |
| CO₂ (high-pressure carbon dioxide) | inert | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | 60 | 1 | — | NFPA 12; lethal, not for occupied rooms |
Reading the table: FM-200’s design concentration (7.0 %) is close to its NOAEL (9.0 %); Novec 1230 has more margin (4.7 % against 10.0 %). FM-200 has a GWP of 3,220 and is being phased down under HFC rules; Novec 1230 has a GWP of 1 [S1]. The comparison is worked through on FM-200 vs Novec 1230. Two further points: a halocarbon discharge first drops and then raises the room pressure, and an inert-gas discharge raises it strongly, so NFPA 2001 requires the enclosure pressure to be checked and most inert systems need a pressure relief vent.
3.2 Water-based systems (NFPA 13, NFPA 750)
NFPA 75 permits sprinklers in IT rooms, and many building codes require them regardless of a gas system [S3]. The type of sprinkler system decides how likely an accidental discharge is.
| System | Pipe when idle | Water flows when | Effect of one false signal | Use in a data center |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet pipe | Full of water | A sprinkler head opens from heat | A damaged head floods at once | Offices, plant rooms |
| Pre-action, single interlock | Dry (supervisory air) | Detection opens the valve, then a head opens | Detection alone fills the pipe; no water out until a head opens | IT rooms where allowed |
| Pre-action, double interlock | Dry (supervisory air) | Detection AND a head opening (loss of air pressure), both required | Neither signal alone admits water to the pipe | Usual choice for IT rooms (NFPA 13) [S3] |
| Water mist (NFPA 750) | Dry or wet, high pressure | As above, through fine nozzles | Much less water than a sprinkler | Battery rooms, generator rooms, some IT rooms |
The trade-offs between wet and pre-action systems are set out on wet vs pre-action. Sprinklers respond to heat, so they act late; the Digital Realty LAX12 fire in 2023 was stopped by sprinklers, and the water damaged servers (dossier).
3.3 Emergency power off
NFPA 70 Article 645 covers IT rooms and the emergency power off (EPO): a guarded, two-stage station that de-energises the room so firefighters can work [S3]. The EPO sequence is tied to the suppression release and tested with it [S5]. Accidental EPO operation takes rooms down, which is why the guard and the second stage exist. In the X Oregon fire of 2025 the burning UPS cabinet was still energised and firefighters had to wait for it to be isolated (dossier).
4. Lithium-ion batteries
Lithium-ion UPS and battery backup units have replaced most lead-acid (VRLA) strings. They need a different plan because a cell in thermal runaway heats itself and spreads to the next cell, and no gaseous agent stops that reaction. In the SK C&C, Digital Realty Singapore and NIRS fires the batteries burned or re-ignited for hours while water cooled them (section 7). The order of protection is: monitor the cells, detect gas and ventilate, control an explosion, separate the units, and then suppress the surrounding fire.
| Row | Full name | Runaway onset, °C | Energy density, Wh/kg | Off-gas, L/Wh | Runaway heat factor | Off-gas species | Use in data centers | Source, basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMC | Lithium nickel manganese cobalt | 150 | 220 | 4.0 | 2.5 | H₂, CO, CO₂, electrolyte vapour, hydrocarbons | Yes (site model: UPS BBU 8 × 1,333 kWh) | Nature Sci. Reports 2024 + UL 9540A; standard |
| LFP | Lithium iron phosphate | 166.8 | 140 | 2.0 | 1.2 | H₂, CO, CO₂, electrolyte vapour | Yes (trend to safer chemistry) | Nature Sci. Reports 2024 + UL 9540A; standard |
| LCO | Lithium cobalt oxide | 150 | 180 | 4.5 | 2.6 | H₂, CO, CO₂, O₂, electrolyte vapour | Rare | Literature; illustrative |
| VRLA | Valve-regulated lead-acid | — | 40 | 0 | 0 | H₂ when overcharged; no thermal runaway of the lithium kind | Legacy UPS | IEEE 1188; standard |
| offgas_LFL | Flammability of the vent gas | — | — | — | — | LFL: H₂ 4.0 % vol; CO 12.5 %; vent-gas blend about 6 % | — | NFPA 855 / UL 9540A gas-detection basis; standard |
How much gas: one 1,333 kWh NMC pack at 4.0 L/Wh can vent 1,333,000 × 4.0 = 5,332,000 L, or 5,332 m³ (derived from [S2]). At a 6 % LFL that is enough to make 5,332 / 0.06 = 88,900 m³ of flammable mixture. An LFP pack of the same size vents half as much (2,666 m³, 44,400 m³ of mixture). No battery room is that large, so the room volume does not dilute a full runaway; exhaust started at 25 % LFL, and the BMS stopping the event earlier, have to.
| Layer | What it does | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Cell monitoring | The battery management system (BMS) watches cell voltage and temperature and disconnects a string on an anomaly, before venting | IEC 62619; UL 9540 [S3] |
| 2. Gas detection and exhaust | H₂/CO sensors alarm at 25 % LFL and start mechanical exhaust | NFPA 855 [S3] |
| 3. Explosion control | Deflagration vent panels or explosion prevention by ventilation, for when gas exceeds the LFL | NFPA 855, which refers to NFPA 68 and NFPA 69 |
| 4. Spacing and separation | Unit spacing and fire-rated walls set from UL 9540A propagation tests at cell, module and unit level, so one unit cannot ignite the next | NFPA 855; UL 9540A [S3] |
| 5. Suppression | Sprinklers or water mist cool the units and stop the surrounding fire; a clean agent can put out flames but not the runaway | NFPA 13; NFPA 750; NFPA 2001 |
| 6. Siting | Battery rooms not above or beside IT halls, so firefighting water cannot reach the servers | Lesson from Digital Realty Singapore 2024 (dossier) |
The fire calculator computes the off-gas volume and runaway energy for a given pack, and the fire checklist lists the battery-room requirements item by item.
5. Standards and the number each one fixes
Twelve documents set the numbers on this page. The AHJ (the authority having jurisdiction: fire service or building authority) and the insurer decide which edition applies to a site.
| Standard | What it governs | Number or rule it fixes | Edition |
|---|---|---|---|
| NFPA 2001 | Clean-agent extinguishing systems | W = (V/s)·C/(100−C); halocarbon discharge ≤ 10 s; hold ≥ 10 min | 2022 |
| NFPA 72 | Fire alarm and signalling (detection) | Spot smoke detector spacing about 9.1 m (about 84 m²); aspirating very-early warning | 2022 |
| NFPA 75 | Fire protection of IT equipment | Room fire rating; suppression; pre-action sprinklers permitted | 2024 |
| NFPA 76 | Fire protection of telecom facilities | Detection and suppression for telecom spaces | 2024 |
| NFPA 13 | Sprinkler installation | Wet vs pre-action; double interlock for data centers | 2025 |
| NFPA 855 | Stationary energy storage | Li-ion siting and spacing; gas detection at 25 % LFL; explosion control | 2023 |
| NFPA 70 (NEC) | Electrical installations, EPO | Art. 645 IT rooms; guarded two-stage EPO | 2023 |
| UL 9540 | Energy storage system safety | Product safety certification of the ESS | current |
| UL 9540A | Thermal-runaway fire propagation test | Off-gas and propagation test at cell, module and unit level | 2024 |
| IEC 62619 | Safety of industrial lithium cells and batteries | Thermal-runaway and safety requirements | 2022 |
| FM Global DS 5-32 | Data-center loss prevention | The insurer’s data-center fire-protection data sheet | current |
| ISO 14520 | Gaseous extinguishing systems | The international counterpart of NFPA 2001 | current |
Also cited on this page: EN 54-20 (aspirating detector classes), NFPA 12 (CO₂ systems), NFPA 25 (inspection of water systems), NFPA 750 (water mist), NFPA 68 and 69 (explosion venting and prevention). The NFPA fire and risk lab works through NFPA 75 and 76 room by room.
6. Inspection, testing and commissioning
A fire system that is not tested drifts: detectors clog, cylinders lose pressure, and new cable penetrations open the room. The table lists the minimum intervals from the standards and the shorter intervals the site checklist adds.
| Task | Interval | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Visual check: cylinder pressure, fire panel status, gas-detection status | Daily | Site practice [S5] |
| Aspirating detector airflow and filter check | Weekly | Site practice [S5] |
| Fire panel function test; abort and manual-release station test | Monthly | Site practice, NFPA 72 [S5] |
| Detector sensitivity check; H₂/CO sensor calibration | Quarterly | Site practice, NFPA 72 / 2001 [S5] |
| Agent quantity and container pressure | At least every 6 months | NFPA 2001, ch. 7 |
| Clean-agent system inspected and tested; cylinder weight and pressure | Annually | NFPA 2001, ch. 7 [S5] |
| Enclosure inspected for new penetrations; door-fan re-test | Annually, and after any change to the room | NFPA 2001, ch. 7 [S5] |
| Detectors and manual stations functional test | Annually | NFPA 72, ch. 14 |
| Smoke detector sensitivity test | Within 1 year of installation, then every 2 years | NFPA 72, ch. 14 |
| Sprinklers inspected from the floor | Annually | NFPA 25, ch. 5 |
| Pre-action valve trip test | Annually; full-flow trip every 3 years | NFPA 25, ch. 13 |
| Main drain test | Annually | NFPA 25, ch. 13 |
| Integrated systems test: detection, alarm, HVAC, EPO, release, BMS together | Annually and at commissioning | Site practice [S5] |
Commissioning gates before the system is accepted [S5]:
- Room integrity: door-fan test shows the concentration is held for at least 10 min; seal and re-test until it passes.
- Agent quantity: charged weight or pressure matches the design calculation; cylinder serials and fill weights recorded.
- Discharge (where required): full discharge in 10 s or less (halocarbon) or 60 s or less (inert), and the measured concentration reaches design.
- Cross-zoning: no single detector releases the agent; pre-discharge delay, abort and manual release all work.
- Interlocks: on a confirmed alarm the air handlers stop, dampers close and the EPO sequence runs.
- Li-ion gas detection: sensors calibrated; alarm at or below 25 % LFL starts the exhaust; the BMS shutdown sequence is confirmed.
- Integrated systems test: detection to alarm to HVAC to EPO to release to BMS, end to end.
The full item list, the symptom-cause-action table and a printable service record are on the fire checklist.
7. Fires in data centers, 2021–2026
Each row links to a dossier with the sequence of events, the sources and an FMEA. Common pattern: the burned area was small, and the outage came from the power cut needed to fight the fire, from water reaching IT equipment, or from batteries that kept re-igniting.
| Date | Site | Where it started | Cause class | What the record shows |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | OVHcloud SBG2, Strasbourg | Ground-floor energy rooms | UPS and lead-acid battery fault | Rooms had detection but no automatic suppression; the UPS and its batteries were in separate rooms and the fault spanned both; wooden floors and single-skin cladding of the free-cooling design helped the fire spread. |
| 2022-10-15 | SK C&C Pangyo, Seongnam | UPS room, basement level 3 | Lithium-ion UPS battery | About 40 m² burned, but about 32,000 servers went dark because power had to be cut; gas suppression cannot stop a cell in runaway; Kakao had its core services at this one site. |
| 2023-05-21 | Digital Realty LAX12, El Segundo | A rack in colocation suite 4 | Cause undetermined | Sprinklers stopped the spread and the water damaged many servers; power was cut to suites 3 and 4, so an unburned suite went dark too. |
| 2024-09-10 | Digital Realty Loyang, Singapore | Battery rooms, third-floor mezzanine | Lithium-ion battery, electrical issue | Water could cool the batteries but not stop propagation, so firefighting lasted days; water reached the server halls and forced the power shutdown that caused the outage. |
| 2025-05-22 | X (Twitter), Digital Realty Hillsboro, Oregon | UPS power cabinet, second floor | UPS cabinet fault | About $250,000 of equipment damage caused a near-global platform outage; the cabinet was still energised, so firefighters could only contain the fire until it was isolated. |
| 2025-09-26 | NIRS government data center, Daejeon | Fifth-floor UPS room, during battery relocation | Lithium-ion UPS battery | A battery switched off for the move ignited about 40 minutes later; 647 government systems went offline, 96 destroyed; initial knockdown took over 10 hours. |
| 2026-05-07 | NorthC Almere | Rear technical compartment with power equipment | Not disclosed (investigation open) | Compartmentation kept the fire out of the data halls, but transformers and UPS shared the compartment, so the site lost all power and the power plant had to be rebuilt. |
| 2026-06-05 | STT GDC Delhi (Google Cloud POP) | Tenant’s third-floor battery room (third-party reporting) | Lithium battery units | A protective power shutdown isolated a Google network POP and degraded Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai; recovery took about three weeks, gated by safety clearance. |
All incident dossiers are listed on the incident library.
8. Tools, data and terms
| Page or file | What it does |
|---|---|
| Fire calculator | Clean-agent mass (NFPA 2001), cylinder count, NOAEL check, GWP, detector count, Li-ion off-gas volume and runaway energy |
| Fire checklist | Design bands, battery-room requirements, commissioning procedure, test intervals, symptom-cause-action table, service record |
| Fire system P&ID | Interactive schematic: detection layers, suppression zones, alarm and EPO integration |
| NFPA fire and risk lab | NFPA 75 and 76 requirements room by room, with a risk model |
| FM-200 vs Novec 1230 | The two halocarbon agents compared: concentration, safety margin, GWP, regulation |
| Wet vs pre-action | Sprinkler system types compared for IT rooms |
| PFAS vapour release (article 26) | Fluorinated fluids such as the Novec family in cooling systems, and what leaks from them |
| clean-agent-properties.csv, li-ion-chemistry.csv, standards-references.csv | The three datasets behind the tables on this page (README) |
Glossary: cross-zoned detection · design concentration · NOAEL / LOAEL · room integrity · off-gassing · thermal runaway · NFPA 855 · UL 9540A · VESDA · pre-action · Inergen · EPO
Frequently asked questions
Which fire suppression system is used in a data center IT room?
Usually a clean agent (Novec 1230 or FM-200) or an inert gas (IG-541, IG-55) that fills the room in 10 s or less (60 s for inert gas) and holds for at least 10 minutes, plus pre-action double-interlock sprinklers where the building code or insurer requires sprinklers. NFPA 75 permits pre-action sprinklers in IT rooms; CO₂ is not used in occupied rooms because it is lethal at its design concentration.
How much clean agent does a room need?
NFPA 2001 gives W = (V/s) × C/(100 − C), with s = k1 + k2 × T. For a 500 m³ room at 20 °C this is 343 kg of Novec 1230 at 4.7 % or 274 kg of FM-200 at 7.0 %. The design concentration must stay at or below the agent NOAEL in an occupied room: 10.0 % for Novec 1230, 9.0 % for FM-200.
Can a clean agent put out a lithium-ion battery fire?
It can put out flames around the battery but it cannot stop a cell in thermal runaway, which makes its own heat and spreads cell to cell. Protection relies on cell monitoring by the BMS, H₂/CO gas detection that alarms at 25 % of the lower flammable limit and starts exhaust (NFPA 855), explosion control, spacing tested to UL 9540A, and water for cooling.
What is cross-zoned detection?
Two independent detectors or detection zones must both alarm before the fire panel starts a gas release. One zone alone raises an alarm only. After the second zone, the panel sounds a pre-discharge alarm, stops air handlers, closes dampers and runs a time delay, typically 30 s, which an abort switch can hold.
How often is a data center fire system inspected and tested?
Clean-agent quantity and pressure at least every 6 months and a full inspection and test annually (NFPA 2001); the room is checked annually for new penetrations and door-fan re-tested after changes; detectors are functionally tested annually and their sensitivity within a year of installation and then every 2 years (NFPA 72); pre-action valves are trip-tested annually with a full-flow trip every 3 years (NFPA 25).
Sources
- [S1] Clean-agent properties dataset — data/fire/clean-agent-properties.csv, 5 rows, compiled from NFPA 2001 (2022) tables, the 3M Novec 1230 datasheet, IPCC and NFPA 12. Taken: design and extinguishing concentrations, NOAEL/LOAEL, k1/k2, discharge times, GWP.
- [S2] Lithium-ion chemistry dataset — data/fire/li-ion-chemistry.csv, 5 rows, compiled from Nature Scientific Reports (2024), UL 9540A, IEEE 1188 and NFPA 855. Taken: runaway onset, off-gas volume and species, LFL values.
- [S3] Standards register — data/fire/standards-references.csv, 12 rows with links to each publisher. Taken: the number or rule each standard fixes.
- [S4] Fire calculation engine — js/fire-model.js and data/fire/README.md, validated by tools/test-fire-calc.mjs. Taken: discharge ≤ 10 s, hold ≥ 10 min, 84 m² per spot detector, ASD pre-alarm 0.005 %/m, inert-gas volume equation.
- [S5] Fire design, commissioning and Li-ion checklist — fire-checklist.html, sections 02, 04 and 07. Taken: ASD band 0.005–0.05 %/m, cross-zoning, 30 s pre-discharge delay (typical), commissioning gates, site test intervals.
- [S6] Standards cited by clause or chapter in the text: NFPA 2001 (2022) ch. 7 and Annex C; NFPA 72 (2022) ch. 14; NFPA 25 ch. 5 and 13; NFPA 13 (2025); NFPA 855 (2023); NFPA 750; NFPA 68; NFPA 69; NFPA 12; EN 54-20 (aspirating smoke detectors). Links to the publishers are in section 5.
- [S7] Incident dossiers on this site, one per row of section 7, each with its own source list.